|
|
Heterophobia
Beware: "Heterophobia" is a word
increasingly used by anti-queer organizations such as
S.T.R.A.I.G.H.T, Fathers For Life, etc.
|
|
|
Heterophobia
: Sexual Harassment and the Future of Feminism by
Daphne PataiA scathing criticism of
political and sexual "correctness," this
thought-provoking and powerfully argued book is sure to incite
debate among all concerned with the legacy and future of woman's
rights. Once
confident in the potential of feminism to create a more equitable
and just society, Daphne Patai persuasively demonstrates in
Heterophobia how the efforts of some feminists - members of what
she calls the "sexual harassment industry" - have
created an environment that stifles healthy and natural
interactions between the sexes. The tremendous growth of sexual
harassment legislation represents feminism's greatest contemporary
success, but this victory has dubious consequences - a world where
kindergarten boys face legal action for kissing female classmates
and men are sued by coworkers for offenses such as unwanted hugs,
uninvited compliments, or glances that last too long.
|
|
Review of Heterophobia (Daphne Patai) by Cathy
Young (February 1999 issue of Reason)
Excerpt:
Patai, a professor of comparative literature and
women's studies at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and
co-author of Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the
Strange World of Women's Studies, is herself a formerly
radical feminist who is appalled by what has become of the
feminist project to remake human relations. Patai recognizes that
the problem which feminists in the 1970s labeled "sexual
harassment" -- coercive or abusive sexual behavior in the
workplace -- is real, and legal recourse was needed against it.
The problem, she asserts, is that from the beginning, the concept
was stretched to embrace not only sexual extortion or aggression
but any "overt manifestations of male sexuality" that
might upset some women. In Patai's view, "the experience of
sexual interest and sexual play ... is an ordinary part of human
life," and while "misplaced sexual attentions" can
be vexatious at times, the only way to inhibit them is create a
climate of repression and intolerance. In fact, she suggests that
we already have such a climate. Some of the worst horror stories
come from academia, where the fear of litigation is compounded by
feminist zealotry, and it is on the academy that Patai focuses.
She chronicles the stories of professors whose careers and whose
very lives have been devastated by charges that are either
chillingly trivial (a writing instructor fired for allowing a
student-initiated discussion of sexual topics) or fantastic
(multiple rapes which somehow don't keep the victim from signing
up for an elective course with the rapist). A classroom statement
that some rape allegations are false or that life begins at
conception can trigger claims of a "hostile environment..."
|
|
Conference paper by Dr. Ray Noonan, Adjunct
Instructor, Fashion Institute of Technology (SUNY)
Abstract:
The term heterophobia is, perhaps, only
less than two decades old-a much shorter period than its more
familiar sibling, homophobia, which dates to 1958. Still,
the value of heterophobia as a concept appears to be largely
unrecognized among many, if not most, sexologists today as we
prepare to bring sexual science and philosophy into the new
millennium. Is heterophobia just another example of the me-too
victimology that continues to grow and flourish in contemporary
America? Or is there more to it that can help us work better with
our students and clients and help society deal with sexuality more
effectively? This workshop, which will combine lecture and small
group discussions, will trace the history of the idea, as well as
the ways in which heterophobia may intrude on our work. We will
also focus on ways to minimize its negative impact on our selves,
clients, and society.
|
|
by Eric Erickson, Southern Voice, Thursday,
22 February 2001
Excerpt:
Just as spring training gears up, a controversy
splitting a gay softball league in South Florida could have impact
in gay sports leagues across the country.
In this game, it's gay men and lesbians who are
accused of discrimination-against gay-friendly heterosexuals who
want to join their gay softball league...
|
|
By Holly Hammond
Excerpt:
The dominant construction of sexuality in our
society is a basic dualism which posits heterosexuality in
opposition to homosexuality, and vice versa. Such a binary
opposition suggests that there are no similarities between these
two categories, and no difference or dissent within them. The
defining characteristic of either category is that it is not the
Other. Binary oppositions necessarily involve hierarchy, depending
upon positioning. In the straight world this is obviously hetero
over homo. Heterosexual activity and identity are privileged or
assumed, whereas non-heterosexuality is denied, despised, and
systematically marginalised. This hierarchy is so dominant that
many people internalise it and often regulate their behaviour,
thoughts and desires to conform with it. This is homophobia and
heterosexism.
However, in the queer community I would suggest
this binary is alive and well. That is, queer experience is
defined in opposition to heterosexuality, by what we are not. What
that really means is that homosexual experience is privileged and
frequently assumed within the queer community. Much of the rituals
associated with developing pride also serve to invert the binary,
they serve to assert a hierarchy of homo over hetero. This is
something which is entirely understandable but isn't mentioned
much at all: Heterophobia...
|
 |
|